Viet Nam vs Zambia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of ownership and control index
Protecting minority investors: Extent of ownership and control index over time
- Viet Nam
- Zambia
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 5 DB15-20 methodology against 5 DB15-20 methodology in Zambia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Zambia ahead.
Viet Nam ranks 35th and Zambia ranks 35th of 191 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of ownership and control index, Viet Nam or Zambia?
- Viet Nam, at 5 DB15-20 methodology against 5 DB15-20 methodology in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of ownership and control index between Viet Nam and Zambia?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Viet Nam and Zambia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Viet Nam and Zambia rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of ownership and control index?
- Viet Nam ranks 35th and Zambia ranks 35th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of ownership and control index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The extent of ownership and control index measures the rules governing the structure and change in control of companies. This index has seven components: (i) whether the same individual cannot be appointed CEO and chairperson of the board of directors; (ii) whether the board of directors must include independent nonexecutive board members; (iii) whether shareholder can remove members of the board of directors without cause before the end of their term; (iv) whether the board of directors must have an audit committee; (v) whether a potential acquirer must make a tender offer to all shareholders upon acquiring 50% of Buyer; (vi) whether Buyer must pay declared dividends within a maximum period set by law; (vii) whether a subsidiary cannot acquire shares issued by its parent company. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.