Republic of Moldova vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Protecting minority investors: Extent of ownership and control index
Republic of Moldova
57.14
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
57.14
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
64th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
64th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of ownership and control index over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 57.14 against 57.14 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 64th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 64th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of ownership and control index, Republic of Moldova or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Republic of Moldova, at 57.14 against 57.14 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of ownership and control index between Republic of Moldova and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of ownership and control index?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 64th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 64th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of ownership and control index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of ownership and control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.