India vs Republic of Korea: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index over time
- India
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
India currently reports 8 0-10 against 8 0-10 in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0 0-10.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.
India ranks 32nd and Republic of Korea ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6 0-10 | 7 0-10 | 1 0-10 | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 6.9 0-10 | 7.6 0-10 | 0.7 0-10 | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index, India or Republic of Korea?
- India, at 8 0-10 against 8 0-10 in Republic of Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index between India and Republic of Korea?
- 0 0-10, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Republic of Korea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do India and Republic of Korea rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index?
- India ranks 32nd and Republic of Korea ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The extent of disclosure index measures the approval and disclosure requirements of related-party transactions. It has five components: (i) whether it is the managing director alone, the board of directors, or the general meeting of shareholders the corporate body who can provide legally sufficient approval for the transaction (points are assigned depending on whether interested directors are permitted to vote or not); (ii) whether an external body (an independent auditor, for example) must review the transaction before it takes place; (iii) whether disclosure by Mr. James to the board of directors or the supervisory board is required; (iv) whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to the public, the regulator or the shareholders is required; and (v) whether disclosure in periodic filings (for example, annual reports) is required.