Syrian Arab Republic vs Togo: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Syrian Arab Republic
70
in 2019
Togo
70
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic rank
55th
Togo rank
55th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Syrian Arab Republic
- Togo
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 70 against 70 in Togo, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Togo ahead.
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 55th and Togo ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syrian Arab Republic | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 60 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 70 | 66 | 4 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Syrian Arab Republic or Togo?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 70 against 70 in Togo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Syrian Arab Republic and Togo?
- 0, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and Togo?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Syrian Arab Republic and Togo rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 55th and Togo ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.