Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Zambia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Saint Kitts and Nevis
40
in 2019
Zambia
40
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
130th
Zambia rank
130th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Zambia
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 40 against 40 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 130th and Zambia ranks 130th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Zambia?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 40 against 40 in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Zambia?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Zambia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Zambia rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 130th and Zambia ranks 130th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.