Russian Federation vs Palestine, State of: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Russian Federation
60
in 2019
Palestine, State of
60
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
94th
Palestine, State of rank
94th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Russian Federation
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 60 against 60 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Russian Federation ranks 94th and Palestine, State of ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 60 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 60 | 60 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Russian Federation or Palestine, State of?
- Russian Federation, at 60 against 60 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Russian Federation and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Palestine, State of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Russian Federation and Palestine, State of rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Russian Federation ranks 94th and Palestine, State of ranks 94th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.