Puerto Rico vs Syrian Arab Republic: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Puerto Rico
70
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
70
in 2019
Puerto Rico rank
55th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
55th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Puerto Rico
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 70 against 70 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 55th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 60 | 10 | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 70 | 70 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Puerto Rico or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Puerto Rico, at 70 against 70 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Puerto Rico and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Puerto Rico and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Puerto Rico ranks 55th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.