North Macedonia vs United Arab Emirates: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
North Macedonia
100
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
100
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
1st
United Arab Emirates rank
1st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- North Macedonia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 100 against 100 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 191 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46 | 40 | 6 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 86 | 78 | 8 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), North Macedonia or United Arab Emirates?
- North Macedonia, at 100 against 100 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between North Macedonia and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and United Arab Emirates?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- North Macedonia ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.