New Zealand vs Singapore: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
New Zealand
100
in 2019
Singapore
100
in 2019
New Zealand rank
1st
Singapore rank
1st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- New Zealand
- Singapore
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 100 against 100 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), New Zealand or Singapore?
- New Zealand, at 100 against 100 in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between New Zealand and Singapore?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Singapore?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Singapore rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- New Zealand ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.