New Zealand vs North Macedonia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
New Zealand
100
in 2019
North Macedonia
100
in 2019
New Zealand rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- New Zealand
- North Macedonia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 100 against 100 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 46 | 54 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 100 | 86 | 14 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), New Zealand or North Macedonia?
- New Zealand, at 100 against 100 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between New Zealand and North Macedonia?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and North Macedonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and North Macedonia rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- New Zealand ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.