Mongolia vs Russian Federation: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Mongolia
60
in 2019
Russian Federation
60
in 2019
Mongolia rank
94th
Russian Federation rank
94th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Mongolia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 60 against 60 in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 94th and Russian Federation ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 60 | 20 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 54 | 60 | 6 | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Mongolia or Russian Federation?
- Mongolia, at 60 against 60 in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Mongolia and Russian Federation?
- 0, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Russian Federation?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Russian Federation rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Mongolia ranks 94th and Russian Federation ranks 94th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.