Republic of Moldova vs Spain: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Republic of Moldova
70
in 2019
Spain
70
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
55th
Spain rank
55th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Spain
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 70 against 70 in Spain, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 55th and Spain ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 50 | 20 | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 70 | 64 | 6 | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Republic of Moldova or Spain?
- Republic of Moldova, at 70 against 70 in Spain as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Republic of Moldova and Spain?
- 0, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Spain?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Spain rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 55th and Spain ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.