Lithuania vs Syrian Arab Republic: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Lithuania
70
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
70
in 2019
Lithuania rank
55th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
55th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Lithuania
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 70 against 70 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 55th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 60 | 10 | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 68 | 70 | 2 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Lithuania or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Lithuania, at 70 against 70 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Lithuania and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Lithuania and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Lithuania ranks 55th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.