Libya vs Trinidad and Tobago: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Libya
40
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
40
in 2019
Libya rank
130th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
130th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Libya
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Libya currently reports 40 against 40 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 130th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 130th of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10 | 40 | 30 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 34 | 40 | 6 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Libya or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Libya, at 40 against 40 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Libya and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Libya and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Libya ranks 130th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 130th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.