Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Nepal: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Lao People's Democratic Republic
60
in 2019
Nepal
60
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
94th
Nepal rank
94th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Nepal
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 60 against 60 in Nepal, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 94th and Nepal ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 60 | 40 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 44 | 60 | 16 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Lao People's Democratic Republic or Nepal?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 60 against 60 in Nepal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Nepal?
- 0, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Nepal?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Nepal rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 94th and Nepal ranks 94th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.