Japan vs Mauritius: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Japan
70
in 2019
Mauritius
70
in 2019
Japan rank
55th
Mauritius rank
55th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Japan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Japan currently reports 70 against 70 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 55th and Mauritius ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 70 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 70 | 70 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Japan or Mauritius?
- Japan, at 70 against 70 in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Japan and Mauritius?
- 0, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mauritius?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Mauritius rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Japan ranks 55th and Mauritius ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.