Indonesia vs New Zealand: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Indonesia
100
in 2019
New Zealand
100
in 2019
Indonesia rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Indonesia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 100 against 100 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92 | 100 | 8 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 100 | 100 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Indonesia or New Zealand?
- Indonesia, at 100 against 100 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Indonesia and New Zealand?
- 0, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and New Zealand?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and New Zealand rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Indonesia ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.