India vs Republic of Korea: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
India
80
in 2019
Republic of Korea
80
in 2019
India rank
32nd
Republic of Korea rank
32nd
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- India
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
India currently reports 80 against 80 in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.
India ranks 32nd and Republic of Korea ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 70 | 10 | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 69 | 76 | 7 | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), India or Republic of Korea?
- India, at 80 against 80 in Republic of Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between India and Republic of Korea?
- 0, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Republic of Korea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do India and Republic of Korea rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- India ranks 32nd and Republic of Korea ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.