Honduras vs Sao Tome and Principe: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Honduras
30
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
30
in 2019
Honduras rank
152nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
152nd
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Honduras
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 30 against 30 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Honduras ranks 152nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 30 | 30 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 15 | 30 | 15 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Honduras or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Honduras, at 30 against 30 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Honduras and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Honduras and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Honduras ranks 152nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.