Eswatini vs Marshall Islands: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Eswatini
20
in 2019
Marshall Islands
20
in 2019
Eswatini rank
171st
Marshall Islands rank
171st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Eswatini
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 20 against 20 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 171st and Marshall Islands ranks 171st of 191 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 20 | 20 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 20 | 20 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Eswatini or Marshall Islands?
- Eswatini, at 20 against 20 in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Eswatini and Marshall Islands?
- 0, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Marshall Islands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Marshall Islands rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Eswatini ranks 171st and Marshall Islands ranks 171st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.