Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Spain: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
70
in 2019
Spain
70
in 2019
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
55th
Spain rank
55th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Spain
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 70 against 70 in Spain, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 55th and Spain ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 50 | 20 | Spain |
| 2010s | 57 | 64 | 7 | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Spain?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 70 against 70 in Spain as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Spain?
- 0, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Spain?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Spain rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 55th and Spain ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.