Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Mali: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
70
in 2019
Mali
70
in 2019
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
55th
Mali rank
55th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Mali
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 70 against 70 in Mali, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 55th and Mali ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 60 | 30 | Mali |
| 2010s | 57 | 66 | 9 | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Mali?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 70 against 70 in Mali as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Mali?
- 0, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Mali?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Mali rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 55th and Mali ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.