Democratic Republic of Congo vs Denmark: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Democratic Republic of Congo
70
in 2019
Denmark
70
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
55th
Denmark rank
55th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Denmark
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 70 against 70 in Denmark, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 55th and Denmark ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 70 | 40 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 57 | 70 | 13 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Democratic Republic of Congo or Denmark?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 70 against 70 in Denmark as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Democratic Republic of Congo and Denmark?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Denmark?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Denmark rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 55th and Denmark ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.