Chad vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Chad
70
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo
70
in 2019
Chad rank
55th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
55th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Chad
- Democratic Republic of Congo
How they compare
Chad currently reports 70 against 70 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 55th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Democratic Republic of Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 30 | 30 | Chad |
| 2010s | 66 | 57 | 9 | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Chad or Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Chad, at 70 against 70 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 0, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Chad ranks 55th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.