Central African Republic vs Spain: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Central African Republic
70
in 2019
Spain
70
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
55th
Spain rank
55th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Central African Republic
- Spain
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 70 against 70 in Spain, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 55th and Spain ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 50 | 10 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 66 | 64 | 2 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Central African Republic or Spain?
- Central African Republic, at 70 against 70 in Spain as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Central African Republic and Spain?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Spain?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Spain rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Central African Republic ranks 55th and Spain ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.