Central African Republic vs Côte d'Ivoire: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Central African Republic
70
in 2019
Côte d'Ivoire
70
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
55th
Côte d'Ivoire rank
55th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Central African Republic
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 70 against 70 in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 55th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 60 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 66 | 66 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Central African Republic or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Central African Republic, at 70 against 70 in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Central African Republic and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Central African Republic ranks 55th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.