Brunei Darussalam vs Trinidad and Tobago: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Brunei Darussalam
40
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
40
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
130th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
130th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 40 against 40 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 130th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 130th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Brunei Darussalam or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 40 against 40 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Brunei Darussalam and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 130th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 130th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.