Botswana vs United States of America: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Botswana
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 74 against 70 in Botswana, a difference of 4.
That makes United States of America's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 55th and United States of America ranks 54th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and United States of America in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76 | 74 | 2 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 70 | 74 | 4 | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Botswana or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 74 against 70 in Botswana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Botswana and United States of America?
- 4, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and United States of America?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and United States of America rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Botswana ranks 55th and United States of America ranks 54th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.