Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sudan: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
30
in 2019
Sudan
30
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
152nd
Sudan rank
152nd
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Sudan
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 30 against 30 in Sudan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 152nd and Sudan ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 0 | 30 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 30 | 14 | 16 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sudan?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 30 against 30 in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sudan?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sudan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sudan rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 152nd and Sudan ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.