Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sao Tome and Principe: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
30
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
30
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
152nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
152nd
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 30 against 30 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 152nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 | 30 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 30 | 30 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 30 against 30 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 152nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 152nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.