Azerbaijan vs North Macedonia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Azerbaijan
100
in 2019
North Macedonia
100
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Azerbaijan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 100 against 100 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52 | 46 | 6 | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 85 | 86 | 1 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Azerbaijan or North Macedonia?
- Azerbaijan, at 100 against 100 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Azerbaijan and North Macedonia?
- 0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and North Macedonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan and North Macedonia rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Azerbaijan ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.