Armenia vs Central African Republic: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Armenia
70
in 2019
Central African Republic
70
in 2019
Armenia rank
55th
Central African Republic rank
55th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Armenia
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 70 against 70 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 55th and Central African Republic ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 60 | 10 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 53 | 66 | 13 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Armenia or Central African Republic?
- Armenia, at 70 against 70 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Armenia and Central African Republic?
- 0, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Central African Republic?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Central African Republic rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Armenia ranks 55th and Central African Republic ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.