Antigua and Barbuda vs Myanmar: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)
Antigua and Barbuda
40
in 2019
Myanmar
40
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
130th
Myanmar rank
130th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Myanmar
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 40 against 40 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 130th and Myanmar ranks 130th of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 30 | 10 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 40 | 31 | 9 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10), Antigua and Barbuda or Myanmar?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 40 against 40 in Myanmar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) between Antigua and Barbuda and Myanmar?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Myanmar?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Myanmar rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 130th and Myanmar ranks 130th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.