Malta vs Peru: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index

Malta
6 0-10
in 2019
Peru
6 0-10
in 2019
Malta rank
51st
Peru rank
51st

Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time

  • Malta
  • Peru
0246200520122019

How they compare

Malta currently reports 6 0-10 against 6 0-10 in Peru, a difference of 0 0-10.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 51st and Peru ranks 51st of 191 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 6 0-10 5 0-10 1 0-10 Malta
2010s 6 0-10 5.8 0-10 0.2 0-10 Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Malta or Peru?
Malta, at 6 0-10 against 6 0-10 in Peru as of 2019.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Malta and Peru?
0 0-10, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Peru?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Malta and Peru rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
Malta ranks 51st and Peru ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Peru: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-director-liability-index-0-10/malta/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-director-liability-index-0-10/malta/peru/">Malta vs Peru: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10)
Unit
0-10
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 2,865 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The extent of director liability index measures when board members can be held liable for harm caused by related-party transactions and what sanctions are available. It has seven components: (i) whether shareholders can sue directly or derivatively for the damage the transaction causes to the company; (ii) whether a shareholder plaintiff can hold Mr. James liable for the damage the Buyer-Seller transaction causes to the company; (iii) whether a shareholder plaintiff can hold other executives and directors (the CEO, members of the board of directors or members of the supervisory board) liable for the damage the transaction causes to the company; (iv) whether Mr. James pays damages for the harm caused to the company upon a successful claim by the shareholder plaintiff; (v) whether Mr. James repays profits made from the transaction upon a successful claim by the shareholder plaintiff; (vi) whether Mr. James is disqualified upon a successful claim by the shareholder plaintiff; and (vii) whether a court can void the trans­action upon a successful claim by a shareholder plaintiff.