New Zealand vs Singapore: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
New Zealand
90
in 2019
Singapore
90
in 2019
New Zealand rank
4th
Singapore rank
4th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- New Zealand
- Singapore
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 90 against 90 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 4th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90 | 90 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 90 | 90 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, New Zealand or Singapore?
- New Zealand, at 90 against 90 in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between New Zealand and Singapore?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Singapore?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Singapore rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- New Zealand ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 4th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.