New Zealand vs Rwanda: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
New Zealand
90
in 2019
Rwanda
90
in 2019
New Zealand rank
4th
Rwanda rank
4th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- New Zealand
- Rwanda
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 90 against 90 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 4th of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90 | 58 | 32 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 90 | 90 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, New Zealand or Rwanda?
- New Zealand, at 90 against 90 in Rwanda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between New Zealand and Rwanda?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Rwanda?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Rwanda rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- New Zealand ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 4th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.