Morocco vs Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Morocco
20
in 2019
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
20
in 2019
Morocco rank
143rd
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank
143rd
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Morocco
- Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 20 against 20 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of has been ahead every year.
Morocco ranks 143rd and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 20 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 20 | 20 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Morocco or Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- Morocco, at 20 against 20 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Morocco and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 0, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Morocco and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Morocco ranks 143rd and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.