Republic of Moldova vs Philippines: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Republic of Moldova
40
in 2019
Philippines
40
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
108th
Philippines rank
108th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Philippines
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 40 against 40 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Philippines ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 108th and Philippines ranks 108th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Republic of Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 30 | 10 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 36 | 31 | 5 | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Republic of Moldova or Philippines?
- Republic of Moldova, at 40 against 40 in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Republic of Moldova and Philippines?
- 0, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Philippines?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Philippines rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 108th and Philippines ranks 108th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.