Republic of Moldova vs Panama: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Republic of Moldova
40
in 2019
Panama
40
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
108th
Panama rank
108th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Panama
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 40 against 40 in Panama, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 108th and Panama ranks 108th of 191 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20 | 40 | 20 | Panama |
| 2010s | 36 | 40 | 4 | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Republic of Moldova or Panama?
- Republic of Moldova, at 40 against 40 in Panama as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Republic of Moldova and Panama?
- 0, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Panama?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Panama rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 108th and Panama ranks 108th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.