Malaysia vs New Zealand: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Malaysia
90
in 2019
New Zealand
90
in 2019
Malaysia rank
4th
New Zealand rank
4th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Malaysia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 90 against 90 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 4th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90 | 90 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 90 | 90 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Malaysia or New Zealand?
- Malaysia, at 90 against 90 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Malaysia and New Zealand?
- 0, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and New Zealand?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and New Zealand rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Malaysia ranks 4th and New Zealand ranks 4th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.