Lesotho vs Republic of Moldova: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Lesotho
40
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
40
in 2019
Lesotho rank
108th
Republic of Moldova rank
108th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Lesotho
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 40 against 40 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.
Lesotho ranks 108th and Republic of Moldova ranks 108th of 191 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10 | 20 | 10 | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 34 | 36 | 2 | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Lesotho or Republic of Moldova?
- Lesotho, at 40 against 40 in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Lesotho and Republic of Moldova?
- 0, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Republic of Moldova?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Lesotho and Republic of Moldova rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Lesotho ranks 108th and Republic of Moldova ranks 108th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.