Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Niger: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Lao People's Democratic Republic
10
in 2019
Niger
10
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
157th
Niger rank
157th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Niger
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 10 against 10 in Niger, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 157th and Niger ranks 157th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10 | 10 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 10 | 10 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Niger?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 10 against 10 in Niger as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Niger?
- 0, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Niger?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Niger rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 157th and Niger ranks 157th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.