Republic of Korea vs Madagascar: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Republic of Korea
60
in 2019
Madagascar
60
in 2019
Republic of Korea rank
51st
Madagascar rank
51st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Republic of Korea
- Madagascar
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 60 against 60 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 51st and Madagascar ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 60 | 20 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 56 | 60 | 4 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Republic of Korea or Madagascar?
- Republic of Korea, at 60 against 60 in Madagascar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Republic of Korea and Madagascar?
- 0, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Madagascar?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and Madagascar rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Republic of Korea ranks 51st and Madagascar ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.