Republic of Korea vs Kosovo: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Republic of Korea
60
in 2019
Kosovo
60
in 2019
Republic of Korea rank
51st
Kosovo rank
51st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Republic of Korea
- Kosovo
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 60 against 60 in Kosovo, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kosovo ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 51st and Kosovo ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Republic of Korea averaged higher in 1 and Kosovo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 52 | 12 | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 56 | 52 | 4 | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Republic of Korea or Kosovo?
- Republic of Korea, at 60 against 60 in Kosovo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Republic of Korea and Kosovo?
- 0, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Kosovo?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and Kosovo rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Republic of Korea ranks 51st and Kosovo ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.