Japan vs Samoa: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Japan
60
in 2019
Samoa
60
in 2019
Japan rank
51st
Samoa rank
51st
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Japan
- Samoa
How they compare
Japan currently reports 60 against 60 in Samoa, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 51st and Samoa ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 60 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 60 | 60 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Japan or Samoa?
- Japan, at 60 against 60 in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Japan and Samoa?
- 0, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Samoa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Samoa rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Japan ranks 51st and Samoa ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.