Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Panama: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Iran, Islamic Republic of
40
in 2019
Panama
40
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
108th
Panama rank
108th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Panama
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 40 against 40 in Panama, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 108th and Panama ranks 108th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Iran, Islamic Republic of or Panama?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 40 against 40 in Panama as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Panama?
- 0, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Panama?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Panama rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 108th and Panama ranks 108th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.