Hong Kong, China vs Mauritius: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Hong Kong, China
80
in 2019
Mauritius
80
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
16th
Mauritius rank
16th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Mauritius
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 80 against 80 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 16th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80 | 80 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 80 | 80 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Hong Kong, China or Mauritius?
- Hong Kong, China, at 80 against 80 in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Hong Kong, China and Mauritius?
- 0, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Mauritius?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Mauritius rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 16th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.