Eswatini vs Palestine, State of: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Eswatini
50
in 2019
Palestine, State of
50
in 2019
Eswatini rank
75th
Palestine, State of rank
75th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Eswatini
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 50 against 50 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 75th and Palestine, State of ranks 75th of 191 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10 | 50 | 40 | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Eswatini or Palestine, State of?
- Eswatini, at 50 against 50 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Eswatini and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Palestine, State of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Palestine, State of rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Eswatini ranks 75th and Palestine, State of ranks 75th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.