Dominican Republic vs Netherlands: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Dominican Republic
40
in 2019
Netherlands
40
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
108th
Netherlands rank
108th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Dominican Republic
- Netherlands
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 40 against 40 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 108th and Netherlands ranks 108th of 191 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8 | 40 | 32 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 40 | 40 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Dominican Republic or Netherlands?
- Dominican Republic, at 40 against 40 in Netherlands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Dominican Republic and Netherlands?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Netherlands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Netherlands rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Dominican Republic ranks 108th and Netherlands ranks 108th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.