Dominican Republic vs Lesotho: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Dominican Republic
40
in 2019
Lesotho
40
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
108th
Lesotho rank
108th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Dominican Republic
- Lesotho
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 40 against 40 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lesotho ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 108th and Lesotho ranks 108th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8 | 10 | 2 | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 40 | 34 | 6 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Dominican Republic or Lesotho?
- Dominican Republic, at 40 against 40 in Lesotho as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Dominican Republic and Lesotho?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Lesotho?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Lesotho rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Dominican Republic ranks 108th and Lesotho ranks 108th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.